Dr Yaw
Adu-Ampomah, the Attorney General’s third prosecution witness in the ongoing
trial of former Ghana Cocoa Board (Cocobod) CEO, Dr Stephen Kwabena Opuni, and
businessman Seidu Agongo, keeps contradicting himself under the heat of
cross-examination, court correspondent Joshua Kodjo-Mensah reported on Tuesday.
On Tuesday, 4 June 2019, the counsel for Dr Opuni, Mr Sam Cudjoe, once again,
threw the witness into a state of confusion during his cross-examination, a
situation that compelled Dr Adu-Ampomah to spill out the truth regarding
Cocobod’s previous sole-sourcing procurements, thereby, contradicting his own
earlier testimony that the state-owned cocoa company had never procured
agrochemicals through that method.
The witness had, in his evidence in chief, told the court that Cocobod usually
advertises in the dailies when it wants to purchase agrochemicals, including
fertilisers, and states in detail via those advertisements, the type of
agrochemicals required.
At the hearing on 28 May 2019, Mr Codjoe challenged Dr Adu-Ampomah’s claim by
providing evidence to prove that the witness, during his tenure as a Deputy
Chief Executive in charge of Agronomy and Quality Control at Cocobod in 2011,
applied to the Public Procurement Authority to sole-source some quantum of
fertiliser.
Confronted with the hard evidence in court during his cross-examination, Dr
Adu-Ampomah admitted to the court that, indeed, those sole-sourced purchases
were made, a sharp contrast to his earlier stance.
Drama unfolded in court during Tuesday’s (4 June 2019) hearing when the witness
admitted to having made purchases through sole-sourcing to the tune of
US$161,692,473.26 from three companies in 2011.
The companies include Chemico Ghana Limited, which supplied US$52,933,000 worth
of Cocoa Feed Granular fertiliSer; Sidalco Ghana Limited, which supplied
US$62,441,335.62 worth of Sidalco K-Rich and Sidalco Balance fertilisers; and
Wienco Ghana Limited, which supplied US$46,318,138.24 worth of Asaase Wura
Granular fertiliser.
Despite these huge purchases of fertiliser in 2011 by Cocobod through
sole-sourcing during the tenure of the state’s witness as the Deputy Chief
Executive, A&QC, the total cocoa yield fell from 1,024,552 tonnes in the
2010/11 crop year to 879,343 tonnes in the 2011/12 crop year.
Dr Adu-Ampomah attributed the fall in yield for that particular crop season, to
what he claimed was a yearly up-and-down swing in yield, explaining that yields
rise and fall every other year, respectively.
When asked if fertilisers purchased in a particular year could have an effect
on the following year’s yield, he said things did not necessarily happen that
way.
But when asked if he knew that in the first year of Dr Stephen Opuni’s
leadership as Chief Executive of Cocobod, the yield shot up to 896,221 tonnes
from 835,446 tonnes of the preceding year despite purchasing a lesser quantum
of fertiliser, Dr Adu-Ampomah told the court that the 2013/14 yield was a
direct result of the application of the previous year’s agrochemicals.
Dr Opuni and Mr Agongo are standing trial for causing financial loss to the
state through the procurement of Agricult Lithovit Fertiliser by the erstwhile
administration of Cocobod.
The case has been adjourned to 12 June 2019.
ClassFM
